Ineffable Ontological Detanglement .: Introspective Assistance & Mental Analysis Manual
Error correction is your semi-conscious system of maintaining your grip on reality. The system operates based on how it is set subconsciously, it's running from your subconscious being utilized by your semi-conscious.
Too much is coming at you at once, you're reading a big fat technical manual with lots of big words, your brain frazzles and you don't know how to grasp at any of the things you're seeing you don't know how to put the definition of this word into the concept you think you're reading about, that's you taking a peek at your error correction system going haywire. Semi-consciously scanning the possibilities within your subconscious, looking for how it is you're going to grasp this. Don't worry there's no such thing as a person this never ever happens to.
Basically you know what's wrong and you know what's right, subconsciously, you think. You know what you know, you think. You know how to act, mentally, on what you're thinking, you think. You're looking for the things that do not match. You know what connects to what and at what level of significance. You know how to predict where this information is going. You're building expectations.
How error correction will unfold for you is based quite heavily on habit formation, cognitive flexibility, skill acquisition, attentional structure and lateral thinking. Error correction failure is generally based in incorrect analysis and self confirmation. However there are many things you do semi-consciously that go beyond incorrect analysis and self confirmation. Generally what's going to interrupt the system itself the most significantly is attention shifting. The most major disruption in your error correction is your perceptual filters.
The most common error correction failures are: Jump an assumption, there's nothing within your subconscious that states you get it so you'll just look for something in and around it, something related, something that feels right. Misapply significance, something that was not meant to dominate the stream of thought becomes dominant in the stream of thought, the concept becomes far too about this thing, it warps your perception of the rest of the concept. It seems to be a commonly held belief, rather than scanning for what you know as evidence you decide to look for your population statistics, you're not very certain so you'll submit to the consensus. It still seems to fit, you didn't predict properly however you still seem to be able to find the ways in which you predicted properly, whatever you can use. I still like it, you went in wanting this information and now it looks like you don't get to have it however you still seem to be able to find the ways in which you get to have it. Your attention was dulled, you missed some of this information and now you find yourself within a new portion of this information and you assume you're either still within the initial concept not realizing we've switched concepts or worse yet you're still within whatever you floated away with for a moment. You keep changing your mind too often and too fast, you realize you're incorrect about something small and so you throw far too much of it away, you realize you're incorrect about something bigger however you retain far too much confidence in your general understanding. I see you reaching, I see you making a hell of a lot of points and none of them resonate fully within my compartmentalized education, however I see you making a lot of them and so that automatically disproves all of them. On that one the person feels an emulation of their own error correction going haywire when they anticipate you doing it. Concept bouncing, you decided the last three concepts disproved your thinking but now you've found the fourth concept with which you can scramble your way into what you now know as your faulty subconscious to disprove for yourself and this has now disproven the entire thing, or knowing you're about to lose so you scramble your way into defeating the first three sentences and so now everything that follows that disproves what you have done has already been disproven. That one also makes the person presenting it feel an emulated spazm in their error correction when they're presenting it. Oh yeah well maybe I don't even know what the definition of this word is WHAMMY. OH YEAH WELL MAYBE I CAN JUST SEMI-CONSCIOUSLY DELIBERATELY SCRAMBLE MY ENTIRE SYSTEM OF ERROR CORRECTION AND NOT ALLOW ANY OF THIS TO ENTER WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT!?
The concept of bias is generally due to your filtered perception, looking at the world AS. However any improperly compartmentalized life experience, improper understanding of your faulty education or self sabotaged or condition fucked with thinking habit is capable of introducing a bias, however within perceptual filter bypass it is generally not going to be an auto-confirmed bias. Unbiased thinking of course doesn't mean you are nothing but the height of purity in your observation, that depends entirely on your level of intelligence and education. Anybody is still capable of fucking up and misreading. Except us.
This is governing more than educational concepts, this is your entire hold on reality. In day to day life, it is generally not being challenged. You know where you are because you understand the landmarks, you have a reasonably good idea of what time it is because you checked your watch a minute ago. Find out you thought it was a minute ago but it was actually twenty minutes ago, feels a whole lot like you just scrambled your brain on big words and scary concepts. This is how you resolve your life, everything makes sense because yesterday leads into today and that was just fine, there's no reason to panic about tomorrow. Unless maybe I'm still panicking about yesterday. Yesterday didn't work, that one didn't work, I don't think that's okay. Is my life wrong?
People who are always within the conversation, they're clicking the right layer of their semi-conscious. Even if they're not entirely locked into the conversation they're entirely locked into the thread of the conversation, the concept of conversation. Generally the only people who are perfect with this are people who bypass their perceptual filters. We can still "Hm? Sorry?" when we're not paying attention, we can still be half in attention and think we're getting what the person is saying but we're actually getting some other thing however those ones really hurt us. We're never slipping outside of the conversational layer and our error correction starts flinging and grasping wherever whenever just flying all over the place, the implied underlying "...Huuh...? Whaa...? I don't... Get... What you're saying... Oh you want the pen? No we're talking about baseball?" within all conversation. It's one of the main reasons we know one of us when we see them, oh you're within the reality layer of consciousness.
High nervous energy and lateral thinking capabilities are a big assist in maintaining perfect conversation, obviously, they're a big assist with all error correction processes. Not just in being really witty, but, in ability to maintain the thread and automatically grasp, not have an error correction failure. Higher verbal working memory and properly compartmentalized semi-conscious awareness of the complexities of sentence flow and all of the common potentialities within how people are capable of breaking proper sentence flow is the main one keeping you straight. You can't be in any way recalling your education semi-consciously or worse yet consciously when you're speaking it needs to have fallen comfortably into your subconscious processes, now your semi-conscious just automatically comfortably has whatever it needs. People with the lowest possible autism click are the best at semi-consciously maintaining an understanding of the variables within language flow.
You have to either lose your inner monologue or layer your inner monologue, you know how to place your inner monologue into a different subsection of attention that in the moment of conversation carries less weight. Generally it needs to be on the subject of the topic of conversation or the conversation itself, a good thinker can drift a little bit away from this and still maintain perfect conversation but there's no such thing as a person who if they drift too far haven't lost the conversation. The layer of attention that used to be your inner monologue should now be what's coming out of your face and what's coming out of your face should be the conscious line of thought. If you're a conversation rehearser you have to not fall into habitual states internally and attempt to track this conversation like you track your pretend conversations. You have to be entirely outside of imposed expectation not giving a single semi-conscious fuck about it, particularly if you think ooohh everyone is looking for my social anxiety. As social anxiety has nothing to do with your ability to maintain the thread, only thinking about the social anxiety itself and knowing others can see it is what will fuck up your conversational error correction.
Semi-consciously you can't be doing any form of delusional expectation of the person's character, you can't be doing any sort of grasping at your understanding of the person, grasping at your understanding of the topic. The more ego invested you are and therefor the more intense your semi-conscious system of ego monitoring insuring this ego is properly fitting into place including the thing they're supposed to be saying, the more you're going to fuck it up. If you don't understand the person, you don't understand the topic, it doesn't matter to the concept of conversation you're not wasting any of your semi-conscious processes on finding the grasp, it's either grasped or it isn't grasped. If you want to find how to grasp what you don't automatically grasp you'll have to do it within the concept of conversation. You may have to demonstrate the hesitation we can all see you demonstrating anyway. Otherwise your error correction is trying to fill in all sorts of blanks, you're wasting too much on predicting what this person is about to tell you, you auto assume you know what's happening as you simultaneously auto assume this is always wrong.
Psychology likes to do a lot of we're not actually going to say it on this one, we're not exploring a lot of these ideas because they end on the implication... That... There is a LAYER of thinking that naturally isn't so hot. Now, it's okay to drive you into oblivion over being born with a mental condition you most certainly don't want any of those, but, implying that the thinking of the normals can sometimes make them look like idiots, something about what we're seeing here is telling us to do the hard ego invested NOPE, no good, this is an evil concept laws of existence this is an evil concept.
A lot of the normals would rather have this information than not have it, it's okay it's just information. NO we... It's... KEEP THEM... SAFE... KEEP THEM SAFE. KEEPTHEMSAFE!! *cries* This is a BIG DEAL, this is a HUGE concept it carries SO MUCH WEIGHT OF SIGNIFICANCE. How on Earth you could ever find yourself studying this particular layer of the mind, watching yourself do that, not even look back at yourself for a second.